Wednesday, November 12, 2014

Maryland Energy Facts

Maryland Energy Facts
"MARYLAND ENERGY FACTS" Electrification in the United States has become a challenge to its citizens. The principal sources of electricity in the US are coal, oil and natural gas, which are classified as fossil fuels. Due to the fact that fossil fuels are non-renewable and they diminish with time, the cost of extracting them is persistently increasing. It's evident that electricity prices are steadily increasing (see article about BGE rate increasing). And in fact, Maryland is ranked 10th in the list of the states ranked by high electricity prices! While coal is Maryland's main source of electricity, the amount of coal that the state produces is far from meeting their electricity requirements. Coal generates 55% of the state's electricity. Maryland also acquires electricity from their single nuclear power plant referred to as the dual-unit Calvert Cliffs. Around 33% of the state's electricity is supplied from this plant. In order to meet their citizens' electricity needs, the state has been forced to import energy resources. Since the coal mined inthe AppalachianMountains is not sufficient, the available amount is supplemented by importing some coal from Pennsylvania and West Virginia. Despite the imported coal, the state still has to depend on natural gas which they import from Norway, Egypt, Trinidad and Tobago. Many issues have emerged about the use of fossil fuels. These fuels release carbon dioxide, which has precarious health & climate effects to humans. Regulations have been imposed to reduce the emission of this gas. Unfortunately, these regulations are costly and they have triggered the increasein energy costs. Lack of affordable energy has become a threat to Maryland's economy. The state has invited utilities, especially thosewho have invested in renewable energy sources to sell a precise percentage of electricity. By the year 2022, the state expects 20% of its retail electricity sales to be generated from renewable energy sources. Out of this percentage, 2% should be solar energy. The more of this solar is installed on consumer's roofs, the more savings on their monthly electricity bills! The post Maryland Energy Facts appeared first on MDGotSun.

Saturday, November 8, 2014

Renewable Energy Overtakes Nuclear And Becomes Scotland Top Power Source

Renewable Energy Overtakes Nuclear And Becomes Scotland Top Power Source
According to newly released statistics from the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change, renewable energy sources produced 32 percent of Scotland's electricity in the first half of 2014 - beating both nuclear power, which used to be Scotland's main source of electricity, and fossil fuels.Scotland produced 10.3 terawatt-hours (TWh) of electricity from renewable energy sources in the first half of 2013. Nuclear energy, which had previously been Scotland's main source of electricity, only generated 7.8TWh over the same period. Other fossil-fuel sources then followed, with 5.6TWh of electricity generated from coal and another 1.4TWh from gas-fired power stations.The energy policy of the Scottish government is that 100 percent of all electricity consumed in Scotland by 2020 should come from renewable energy sources. The majority of renewable energy in Scotland comes from wind and hydro. Onshore wind generated more than half of all renewable electricity output in Scotland in 2013. Hydro power contributed almost one third of renewable electricity output. Experts say that other renewable energy sources, such as biomass, have a substantial potential for growth in the future.Environmental campaigners and leaders in the green energy sector have hailed this as an historic event and urged increased commitment towards renewables in Scotland and the rest of the UK.Niall Stuart, chief executive of the industry body Scottish Renewables, said that "the renewables industry has come a long way in a short space of time" and that there is still "plenty of potential" for more. Besides fighting climate change, Stuart also said that renewables will decrease the country's reliance on imported energy while supporting communities across Scotland with more jobs and investment."The announcement that renewables have become Scotland's main source of electricity is historic news for our country and shows the investment made in the sector is helping to deliver more power than ever before to our homes and businesses," Stuart added. "This important milestone is good news for anyone who cares about Scotland's economy, our energy security and our efforts to tackle climate change."Lang Banks, director of WWF Scotland, said that this "represents a major step on the way to Scotland becoming a 100 per cent renewable nation" and added that "last month, while nuclear reactors were forced to shut because of cracks, Scotland's renewables were quietly and cleanly helping to keep the lights on in homes across the country.""Put simply, renewables work and are helping to cut climate change emissions and create jobs in Scotland."

Saturday, November 1, 2014

World Largest Off Shore Wind Turbine 2014

World Largest Off Shore Wind Turbine 2014
Wind power is becoming one of the largest renewable energy source in modern world. Current researches on wind turbine focuses on extracting maximum power from the wind. New wind turbines have been designed to meet the requirements.

For example, airborne wind turbine technology by Altaeros Energies is suitable for high altitude winds. Now Siemens, a German multinational conglomerate company along with DONG Energy is building the largest wind turbine having blades of length 75 metres.

The wind turbine is planned to be installed off the Britain coast from 2014. The blades are only slightly smaller than the Airbus A380 wingspan which is 79.8 metres. Each blade is is made from two pieces of carbon fibre.

The rotor diameter is 154 metres and has a swept area of 18,600 square metres. According to Siemens, it can generate upto 6MW that can supply power to 6,000 households.

It requires a special truck to transports these blades to their place of installation which is at distance from the factory.

These offshore wind turbines is capable of producing more energy than the onshore wind turbines. European countries are looking forward into offshore power generation to meet the future energy requirements.

Credits: Siemens, DONG Energy

Also read:- Flying Wind Turbine Technology- Paper Aircraft Propelled By Inversion- Fascinating Super fast airplanes

Friday, October 31, 2014

Chapter 4 Seeking The Lightseti Part 6

Chapter 4 Seeking The Lightseti Part 6
The following continues the serialization of Chapter 4 on the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence from SIMPLE SOLUTIONS for Humanity:

HAWAII AND SETI


There were several astrophysicists at the University of Hawaii Institute of Astronomy and Physics Department who I've met with to talk about SETI. All of them, to my knowledge, came and went over time.

I first became involved when I sent a letter to Mayor Dante Carpenter of the Big Island of Hawaii, dated March 1, 1974 ("in the mid-60's we were engineers at the Hutchinson Sugar Company and shared the same office for several years"). I had just returned from an American Association for the Advancement of Science Conference in San Francisco, and listened to the presentation by Barney Oliver and Jack Billingham on Project Cyclops. They had proposed spending 5 billion ("later expanded to 10 billion") over the next 15 years just to listen to the Universe. Mind you, this was in 1974 dollars, so that would be equivalent to a scientist today proposing a 25 billion SETI project. I wrote to Mayor Carpenter to meet with Jack Billingham, who was into snorkeling in Hawaii, for the Big Island surely had some worthwhile sites, both snorkeling and a possible location for Project Cyclops.

Like most things I have proposed over time, nothing happened. But, as reported earlier, I did join the Billingham group at the Ames Research Center two summers later to test out some of my ideas. Thus, it was in 1976 when I first advised NASA on my plan to cost-effectively detect an extrasolar planet using Townes' laser light theory. After being ignored by them over the past few decades-well, actually, interest was lacking from both ends-I toyed with the idea of helping a high school student beat NASA at directly finding an Earth-like planet revolving around a star. I never found time to do this, but was partly daunted by a fear that the concept made no real sense.

But on the Big Island, detection potential was rapidly expanding. William Myron Keck was a self-educated oil worker who founded Superior Oil Company and became very, very rich through drilling and offshore exploits in the field. The Keck Foundation, started in 1954, received an infusion of 43 million in 1979, and now had assets greater than 1 billion. A sum of 144 million went to the California Institute of Technology and partners to build the Keck Telescope and Observatory on Mauna Kea. More than ten years ago I remember driving one of his sons, who I believe was also called Bill, with his new second or third, wife, through a whiteout, a true blizzard, to inspect Keck I. At 13,796 feet (4205 meters), and all that snow, I was convinced that this was not a place I again wanted to visit.

In 2001, the W.M. Keck Observatory and NASA jointly announced their "outrigger" project to link Keck I and Keck II with six 1.8 meter (6 foot) new telescopes to provide sufficient resolution to detect these planets. Unfortunately, this came at a time when Hawaiians and environmentalists were in a strengthened mode, and thought that enough was enough. There were already too many telescopes on the mountain. If my street smart geothermal staff got derailed when environmentalists were weak, there was not much hope for the astrophysicists.

Yet, in 2005, NASA officially selected Mauna Kea for the Outrigger Telescope Project because no alternate site matched the scientific capability of Mauna Kea. There was some passing mention of the Wekiu bug, found nowhere else in the world. This insect, actually, is interesting, as its blood has an anti-freeze like substance. Well, Mauna Kea Anaina Hou ("People who Pray for the Mountain"), a local organization, was watching, and pointed out that:

o o o o o o o o NASA did offer 1.86 million towards Native Hawaiian causes. A sum of 15 million to 20 million was spent to prepare the documentation.

In June of 2006, NASA announced that they were pulling out of the Outrigger Project, saving 50 million. That same month, acceding to a Natural Resource Defense Council's suit, U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper issued a temporary restraining order barring the use of any sonar in the annual rim of the Pacific naval exercise ("Rimpac") around Hawaii, involving 19,000 servicemen, 35 surface ships, six submarines, and 160 aircraft and amphibious forces of the navy and coast guard from the U.S., Australia, Canada, Chile, Peru, Japan, UK, and Korea, severely compromising their activities.

So, the thought from the intelligentsia then was that Hawaii might well have eliminated itself from playing significant roles in the romance of space, defending freedom and developing renewable energy, all because environmental and cultural factions prevailed over technological progress. The irony is that much of this effort involved the research of clean energy technologies and high tech jobs for tomorrow. Well, there, too, is the evidence of a pod of 200 melonhead whales frightened into Hanalei Bay, Kauai in the 2004 Rimpac. In 2008, our Commander in Chief, President George Bush, override the judiciary by exempting the Navy from this nonsense, but permits for this planet seeking project were rescinded.

But, still alive is The Thirty Meter Telescope ("TMT--conceptualization above)", ten times more powerful than any other, to watch planets orbit distant stars. They never learn. After an intensive review of all the usual suspects, surprise, surprise...Mauna Kea was selected in July of this year, with an operational date projected to be in 2018. While Hubble is still operating, who knows, it might not get a reboost, and TMT is almost a decade in the future, so perhaps a high school science fair project might still be a worthwhile endeavor.

So I went to one of the most innovative public high schools in Hawaii, Kapolei, principled by Alvin Nagasako, a very progressive educator. My primary purpose was to gain a sense of where the field was for my chapter on education. However, I thought I might as well also try to find a high school student to beat NASA at directly discovering an earthlike planet outside our solar system. The teacher coordinating science courses, it turned out, had a son, who already had directly found an extrasolar planet. He used a masking technique and actually succeeded. So much for trying to interest him in something as prosaic as an optical coherent technique for what he had already accomplished. I nevertheless introduced this student to my contact at the Institute of Astronomy, and waited to help. Nothing happened. The student has since graduated from high school and the astrophysicist has left Hawaii. I think I've heard this song before.

Reviewing in hindsight, a third of a century later after my Ames stint, I should have learned from an even earlier experience not to joke around when it comes to scientific proposals. In the early '70's I submitted one to tap magma for geothermal power by leading off with a B.C. cartoon on power from volcanoes...and got thrown out for irreverence. The combination of PAT from La Mancha was not smart.

Thus, the field still is mostly confined to measuring star wobbles and finding giant sized ("meaning no chance for life") planets. Notwithstanding TPF, NASA's main-line detection architectures seem not to be close to directly measuring an Earth size planet AND DETERMINING ITS ATMOSPHERE.

Execution of the recommendations I provided in my three-decade old NASA report, "To See the Impossible Dream: the Planetary Abstracting Trinterferometer," remains tantalizingly in the future. If this book ever gets published, perhaps I will be contacted by some high school student ["PTakahas@Hotmail.Com"]...or NASA.

- The Dow Jones Industrials rose 69 to 10405, while world markets almost all went up. The Japan Nikkei is just under 10000. Gold dropped 2/toz to 1134. Crude oil is now just below 71/barrel.

-Tropical Cyclone Cleo at 55 MPH is still heading in the general direction of Mauritius and Le Reunion Island, but appears to be weakening and could well move southward enough.-

Sunday, October 26, 2014

What The Payback Dont Ask

What The Payback Dont Ask
From an article by Randy Hanson in the "Hudson Star-Observer":

Craig Tarr has grown mildly impatient with people who ask what the payback is on the solar energy systems he designs.

"I don't like to discuss things in terms of payback," he says. "My question to that is, when you bought your plasma TV was there a payback? Or did you do it because you wanted to, and it brought comfort to your life?"

For the people who buy his solar energy systems, part of the payback is knowing that they have reduced their carbon footprint.

Craig Tarr, a professional engineer, earns about half of his income by designing renewable energy systems. His goal is to make renewable energy 100 percent of his business within two or three years.

Tarr is the founder of Energy Concepts, a two-year-old renewable energy business located at 2349 Willis Miller Drive in Hudson's St. Croix Business Park. He's formed a partnership with Paul Steiner of Steiner Plumbing, Electric & Heating of River Falls, which installs the solar and wind energy systems that Tarr custom designs for homes and businesses.

Solar energy systems are still quite pricey, but a cash-back reward from Wisconsin's Focus on Energy program and a 2,000 tax credit from the federal government help reduce the sticker shock.

According to Tarr, a solar hot-water system for a family of four at a price of 11,000 to 12,000 is the best buy for residential customers.

Focus on Energy provides a 20 percent cash-back reward on renewable energy systems, which reduces the price of a 12,000 system by 2,400. The 2,000 federal tax reduction further lowers the price of a 12,000 system to 7,600.

Area Xcel Energy and St. Croix Gas customers are eligible for the Focus on Energy rebate. St. Croix Electric Cooperative doesn't participate in the program and its customers aren't eligible for the rebate.

Saturday, October 25, 2014

Nitrous Oxide Emissions Could Double By 2050 Study Finds

Nitrous Oxide Emissions Could Double By 2050 Study Finds
Emissions of nitrous oxide possibly will spare by the central
of the century if left unobstructed, a new mug up finds. And nitrous oxide is the third major partaker to manmade stick out warming.
So obligation we be worried?

Smiling GAS


Ceiling band know nitrous oxide as smiling clouds, used as a mild
anaesthetic by doctors and dentists. But it is excessively a charming conservatory gas.

Nitrous oxide is the third-largest partaker to the
manmade conservatory manipulate, time was carbon dioxide and methane.

A new mug up, published in the record Unpretentious
Cram Enter, brings tied all the projections for
future nitrous oxide emissions from different researchers. The
come to blows give that on ensign emissions command increase 83 per cent by
2050, if we carry on with business as geared up.

The mug up excessively looks at how emissions might be curbed
together with now and the central of the century. If demure attempts are made, the mug up finds, nitrous oxides would settle down increase by about 26 per cent. But emissions possibly will score by as much as 22 per cent if we seriously get our act tied.

All the projections were made using a on or after be a sign of of 2005.
This key in the researchers are able to see how decent nitrous oxide emissions in up-to-the-minute animation weigh to the different scenarios. And the bad news is that we're right now on the business-as-usual path, the researchers say.

Possible Travels


Bug undo nitrous oxide naturally by
rift lint nitrogen in the soil and stack. Chart emissions from
natural sources are right now about multiply by two populace of emissions from whatsoever schedule.

But so natural emissions develop not special slightly as
the working alter, manmade emissions develop. This increase
has caused nitrous oxide concentrations in the proclaim to anyway
hasty as the the mid-19th century, as unconscious underneath.

Atmospheric point of view of nitrous oxide from
1750 to 2013 (in parts per billion). IPCC [adapted
by Carbon Brief]

Set 66 per
cent of manmade nitrous oxide emissions spring from
agriculture. Nitrous oxides are emitted from the nitrogen in
compost, stimulant and crop residues. The bordering most pitch
sources are burning fossil fuels for energy and transport, making
up 15 per cent of emissions, and forest fires and biomass
cookstoves at 11 per cent.

WARMING Influence


As there's far smaller number nitrous oxide in the
proclaim than carbon dioxide, it's an pitch conservatory gas
for two focal reasons: it's like crazy efficient at action-packed energy, and it stays in the proclaim for a fancy interlude.

Subsequently emitted, nitrous oxide stays in the
proclaim for about 120 animation. Finer 100 animation, each one molecule has a warming impact close to 300 times that of carbon dioxide, and about
9 times fat than methane.

In toting up to its warming impact, nitrous oxide
excessively depletes the ozone
layer. So the
Montreal Decorum restrained the use
of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), nitrous oxide is now
the most fundamental ozone-depleting authenticity in the
proclaim.

The mug up draws carefulness to nitrous oxide emissions and acts a comment that carbon dioxide isn't the unmarried conservatory gas that desires to be addressed. For example the research doesn't meeting what action can be crazed, it does grow less more than a few emergence exertion. For example, the rule impact of expanding biofuel production isn't
right now included in nitrous oxide projections, but the authors
say it "possibly will go away the most fundamental source to get the drift".

The mug up examines what might get rid of if we develop a future biofuel liquidation. Unmoving, with so many reservations in predicting adoption of biofuels, the estimates of nitrous oxide emissions payment a immense collection. At the low end, emissions from biofuel production possibly will be small, but at the top end they possibly will be close to spare current manmade emissions. So - yet unconventional complicating mania to ruminate as we ambiance about how to decarbonise.

Davidson, E. & Kanter, D. (2014) Inventories
and scenarios of nitrous oxide, Unpretentious Cram Enter, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/105012

Friday, October 24, 2014

Value Of Generation From Small Scale Residential Pv Systems

Value Of Generation From Small Scale Residential Pv Systems
This report presents a detailed analysis of 'fair price' for exports from residential solar Photovoltaic (PV) systems.The NSW Solar Bonus Scheme provided strong support for the uptake of small scale PV systems through a gross feed-in tariff of around 60 c/kWh, reduced to 20 c/kWh in October 2010. Rapid uptake of small scale rooftop PV systems under the scheme has led to the level of installations breaching the scheme cap of 300 MW, resulting in the closure of the scheme in May 2011. A key issue going forward is to develop support mechanisms to support the industry until such time as it becomes economically self sufficient. However, the NSW government is concerned that any support does not increase costs faced by electricity consumers.Framing ongoing support is likely to be based on the two key issues.First, what is the value of net exports (that is, electricity generated but not consumed within the residence) from roof-top systems? For electricity consumed internally, the value is equivalent to the avoidable component of the retail tariff. One view is that the value of net exports should also equal the retail tariff as any electricity generated is likely to be consumed by nearby residences. The alternative view is that the tariff on exports is the value of generation on the wholesale market. Second, what level of support in the form of a premium tariff rate on net exports, is required to allow the industry to continue to develop to the point where it becomes economically sustainable. Based on conservative estimates of the level of future cost reductions, it is likely that the cost of generation from small scale systems will be equivalent to the cost of grid supplied electricity sometime towards the end of this decade. But in order to achieve these cost reductions some level of support may be required. This report contains the findings of an assessment of these issues.

Source: about-alternative-energy.blogspot.com